[ccccip] Action Tables for 2009 Caucus -- proposals ASAP please
Clancy Ratliff
culturecat at gmail.com
Sun Apr 27 21:45:31 EDT 2008
That's wonderful; I look forward to receiving it.
Also, for those of you who have contacted me regarding an action table
-- I've noted your contact information, but I do need a brief topic
and proposal (75-100 words) from you for the caucus proposal.
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 8:19 PM, CAROL P. HAVILAND <cph at csusb.edu> wrote:
> Hi Clancy:
> We are working on the pedagogy table chunk and will have it to you in a day or two
> Carol
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Clancy Ratliff <culturecat at gmail.com>
> Date: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 8:12 pm
> Subject: [ccccip] Action Tables for 2009 Caucus -- proposals ASAP please
> To: CCCC IP Caucus <discuss at ccccip.org>
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Proposals for 4Cs next year are due May 9. I need to put together the
> > proposal, as I'm the senior co-chair this year, and I'll need your
> > brief descriptions of action tables. I will also need your contact
> > information when you propose your action table. Usually the online
> > proposal system asks for pretty much everything: email address,
> > mailing address, phone number, office phone, institutional
> > affiliation. Go ahead and send me all of that. I've pasted below last
> > year's proposal in case you want to revisit these last action table
> > proposals to build upon.
> >
> > I may be off email for a week or so; as you know, I have some
> > family/medical issues coming up starting this coming Tuesday, so you
> > may not get an acknowledgment of receipt of your proposal right away.
> >
> > Clancy
> >
> >
> > Intellectual Property in Composition Studies
> >
> > Session: IP.1 on Apr 2, 2008 from 2:00 PM to 5:30 PM Cluster: n/a)
> > Not Applicable
> > Type: Wednesday Event Interest Emphasis: not applicable
> > Level Emphasis: all Focus: not applicable
> >
> > Description
> >
> > Since its first appearance at CCCC in 1994, the Caucus on Intellectual
> > Property and Composition/ Communication Studies (CCCC-IP) has
> > organized pre-conference meetings where members discuss the
> > intersections of intellectual property policy and composition studies.
> > CCCC-IP members work in groups during the meeting and develop action
> > strategies on topics related to teachers' and students' IP rights,
> > plagiarism and plagiarism detection services, fair use in education,
> > open access institutional policies, copyright negotiation with
> > publishers, and open source software adoption in education, to
> > name a
> > few.
> >
> > Co-chairs for the upcoming 2008 conference intend to begin the meeting
> > with reports on ongoing action activities related to plagiarism
> > detection services, open access repositories, and authorial rights to
> > published scholarship. Following the opening remarks, all meeting
> > participants will meet in roundtables, or "action tables," to discuss
> > the issues outlined below. Designated speakers for each action table
> > will provide 6-8 minute overviews of their topics and review any
> > recent actions taken during the preceding year. All participants will
> > then make plans for developing media action strategies, preparing
> > position statements, and creating other types of political,
> > professional, and pedagogical documents. At the end of the workshop,
> > participants will reconvene to share their plans and recommendations
> > for future action.
> >
> > Last year, CCCC-IP was officially recognized by CCCC as a caucus which
> > meets during the afternoon of the pre-conference workshop. We hope
> > that CCCC will continue to recognize CCCC-IP as a non-payment event
> > this year as well.
> >
> > Action Tables
> >
> > Student Responses to Plagiarism Detection Services
> >
> > Drawing on recent court cases and anecdotal evidence, Presenter #1 and
> > Presenter #2 will discuss how students are affected by the culture of
> > surveillance encouraged by plagiarism detection services. They will
> > open up a conversation about productive options for students in
> > responding to situations where they are required to submit their texts
> > to these services.
> >
> > Re-thinking-thinking up: Work for Hire and Fair Use Position
> > Statements
> > Presenter #3 will outline the basics of the 2000 CCCC-IP position
> > statement on fair use, suggesting areas for change. Informing this
> > change and the possible construction of a Work for Hire/Faculty
> > Ownership of Texts Position Statement, Presenter #4 will report his
> > findings on research into work for hire policies at US institutions.
> > Presenter #5 will outline areas of concern for community college
> > faculty in this larger conversation. The speakers will take comments
> > to develop position statements for the larger academic community, and
> > for community colleges as well.
> >
> > IP, Plagiarism, and Pedagogy: Teaching Rules/Teaching Concepts
> >
> > Presenters #6, #7, & #8: This table's work will grow out of the 2007
> > table discussion of the difference between teaching concepts and
> > rules. One reason teaching about plagiarism may have limited
> > effect is
> > that it often teaches students a set of rules rather than inviting
> > them to think critically about the concepts of plagiarism and
> > intellectual property. At least two problems result: a focus on
> > skirting legal issues rather than thinking conceptually about
> > ownership, and a failure to keep pace with rapidly changing
> > legislation. Asking the questions, what rules and practices should
> > writers learn to observe, interrogate, or expect to change, and what
> > concepts underlie those rules and practices, we will compile a working
> > list of rules and concepts and examples of each that may help faculty
> > members teach more effectively about IP and plagiarism issues.
> >
> > Institutional Policy and Faculty IP Rights: Redefining Instruction and
> > Research in Composition
> >
> > Presenter #9: Recent developments in the online delivery of research
> > and instruction have spurred many universities, including the
> > University of California and University of Texas systems, to revisit
> > faculty intellectual property rights policies, both with regard to
> > research and instructional materials. The status of composition
> > professionals, however, remains a contested area that will require
> > close scrutiny and active engagement to develop and maintain sound
> > policy. A tendency on the part of administrators to define
> > separate IP
> > policies for research and instructional faculty, as well as for
> > research and teaching materials, has potentially deleterious
> > consequences for composition professions, since their research is
> > often classroom-based and their instructional materials are comprised
> > of valuable and highly developed intellectual property. Consistent,
> > early intervention in policy-making can prevent unintentional
> > deterioration of IP rights and working conditions for composition
> > faculty, and may even lead to clearer, better relations with
> > university administrators.
> >
> > Open Access Publishing and Institutional Policies
> >
> > Recent initiatives by the University of Kansas have prompted new
> > discussion of open access publishing and institutional policies.
> > Presenter #10 will discuss strategies for enhancing open access
> > publication, report on the status of the Google lawsuits, and consider
> > the implications of shifting NCTE to open access policies.
> > Presenter #
> > 11 will report on and analyze recent University of California mandates
> > regarding open access institutional repositories, and discuss the
> > processes through which those mandates are being established.
> > Presenter #12 will participate in constructing and presenting these
> > reports.
> >
> > Intellectual Property Issues with Podcasting and iTunes University
> >
> > Presenter #13 will discuss the intellectual property issues
> > related to
> > educational podcasting, particularly as they involve agreements
> > between corporations like Apple with iTunesU and universities. She
> > will explore what rights faculty have over their podcasts, what
> > faculty and students need to know about podsafe music, and what rights
> > students have over podcasts, (especially with Creative Commons
> > licensing), and what faculty need to be aware of if/as they move into
> > this area of educational technology.
> >
> > Participant Affiliation Speech Title (if known)
> > Charles Lowe
> > (Co-Chair) Grand Valley State University Intellectual Property in
> > Composition Studies
> > Clancy Ratliff
> > (Co-Chair) University of Louisiana at Lafayette Intellectual Property
> > in Composition Studies
> > James Purdy
> > (Speaker 1) Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania Student
> > Responses to
> > Plagiarism Detection Services
> > Lisa Maruca
> > (Speaker 2) Wayne State University Student Responses to Plagiarism
> > Detection Services
> > Martine Courant Rife
> > (Speaker 3) Michigan State University and Lansing Community
> > Co Re-thinking-thinking up: Work for Hire and Fair Use Position
> > Statements
> > Timothy Amidon
> > (Speaker 4) Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort
> > Wayne Re-thinking-thinking up: Work for Hire and Fair Use Position
> > Statements
> > Bradley Bleck
> > (Speaker additional) Spokane Falls Community
> > College Re-thinking-thinking up: Work for Hire and Fair Use Position
> > Statements
> > Carol Carol Peterson Haviland
> > (Speaker additional) California State University, San Bernardino IP,
> > Plagiarism, and Pedagogy: Teaching Rules/Teaching Concepts
> > Steve Westbrook
> > (Speaker additional) California State University, Fullerton IP,
> > Plagiarism, and Pedagogy: Teaching Rules/Teaching Concepts
> > Brian Ballentine
> > (Speaker additional) West Virginia University IP, Plagiarism, and
> > Pedagogy: Teaching Rules/Teaching Concepts
> > James Donelan
> > (Speaker additional) UC Santa Barbara Institutional Policy and Faculty
> > IP Rights: Redefining Instruction and Research in Composition
> > Jeffrey Galin
> > (Speaker additional) Florida Atlantic University Open Access
> > Publishing and Institutional Policies
> > Karen Lunsford
> > (Speaker additional) University of California at Santa Barbara Open
> > Access Publishing and Institutional Policies
> > Wendy Warren Austin
> > (Speaker additional) Edinboro University of Pennsylvania Intellectual
> > Property Issues with Podcasting and iTunes University
> >
> > --
> > Clancy Ratliff
> > Assistant Professor and Director of First-Year Writing
> > Department of English
> > University of Louisiana at Lafayette
> > http://culturecat.net/
> >
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss at ccccip.org
> > http://mail.ccccip.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_ccccip.org
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at ccccip.org
> http://mail.ccccip.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_ccccip.org
>
--
Clancy Ratliff
Assistant Professor and Director of First-Year Writing
Department of English
University of Louisiana at Lafayette
http://culturecat.net/
More information about the Discuss
mailing list